In The News

The principals of M&A are quoted regularly and frequently in publications ranging from Business Week and Forbes to the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, New York Post, Los Angeles Times, and other major publications worldwide. M&A has been the subject of interviews on business-radio and television programs including the Fox Business News, CBS MarketWatch, The Street.com TV, Yahoo! Finance TV, Sirius XM Radio, BBC-Worldwide and CNBC. Below are links to a sample of articles in which M&A has been quoted:

Sun and the Rumors That Will Not Die

June 2003

Sun and the Rumors That Will Not Die

By K.C.Swanson
Staff Reporter

06/20/2003

URL: http://www.thestreet.com/tech/kcswanson/10095201.html

Sun Microsystems (SUNW:Nasdaq - news - commentary) can't seem to quash rumors that it may be snatched up by a larger tech shop. 

Some market watchers say the speculation helps explain the sharp rise in Sun shares over the past six weeks, although analysts are skeptical about why anyone would want to buy the troubled server and storage maker. Thursday, CEO Scott McNealy called such speculation "nonsense," according to a Reuters report. He insists no one can afford to buy the company he co-founded 21 years ago.

But the fact that McNealy felt compelled to comment raises the broader question: If Sun doesn't want to be acquired and nobody wants to acquire it, what's keeping the takeover rumors alive? The likely answer: A combination of wishful thinking by investors eager to see the stock rise and sentiment that a broader pickup in M&A is getting under way. 

The chatter about Sun may have gotten an extra boost from Oracle's (ORCL:Nasdaq - news - commentary) proposed takeover of PeopleSoft (PSFT:Nasdaq - news - commentary) , says Dennis Garris, a partner with the law firm of Alston & Bird and former chief of M&A at the Securities and Exchange Commission. "Especially when an industry sees a significant high-profile deal announced like the Oracle-PeopleSoft deal, everyone wonders, 'Well, who's next?' It's an unanswered question as to what drives the market into M&A rumor speculation, but I think a lot of it is just hope that someone will find value in their investment," says Garris. 

Typically, the stock of an acquisition target rises. Indeed, Sun shares have jumped 55% since May 2, when rumors began circulating that it might be taken over. 

M&A lawyers agree that, in general, activity has picked up in just the past six months after being largely moribund for the past couple of years. 

"People who are interested in buying public corporations know stocks are still at a fairly decent price and things are out of the doldrums. They don't have the inherent risk they had two years ago that [the economy] could get even worse," says Philip Garon, chairman of the law firm of Faegre & Benson. Those conditions tend to generate more gossip about possible takeover targets, he adds. 

For now, most deals are expected to be confined to "middle-market" companies with sales of $25 million to $200 million, with acquisition targets likely to be those companies fretting over dwindling cash reserves. 

By comparison, Sun claims $12.5 billion in revenue with $2.6 billion in cash and short-term investments. 

To be sure, less savory motivations could also play a role in takeover speculation. "There are people who make money off these rumors," points out Ken Marlin, head of M&A firm Marlin and Associates. Purposely spreading a rumor is an illegal form of market manipulation. 

From a fundamental standpoint, he adds, the Sun rumors don't make much sense because few companies could afford it. 

As a starting point, assume a potential acquirer would need to offer somewhere around two times Sun's annual revenue of about $12 billion. (That's less than Oracle's bid of about three times sales for PeopleSoft, reflecting the fact that Sun's current fiscal year is unprofitable and that it plays in the computer hardware space -- a lot less sexy than enterprise software.)

"You're talking about a purchase price at over $20 billion, $21 billion to get the market's attention and the board's attention. There just aren't many people who can do a $20 billion purchase," says Marlin.
 

McNealy himself makes the same argument. "Sure, we are a public company, but we have a capitalization of about $17 billion. Then you'd have to come up with a 30% to 40% premium to make a bid for us," he said, according to the Reuters report. "What U.S. company -- apart from a condemned monopoly -- has $25 billion in cash?" 

Indeed, Microsoft (MSFT:Nasdaq - news - commentary - research - analysis) doesn't want to move into the hardware business, and  (IBM:NYSE - news - commentary - research - analysis) -- another company renowned for its deep pockets -- hasn't indicated any desire to buy Sun. With no likely buyers on the horizon, plenty of cool-headed folks simply discount the speculation. Ian Winer, co-head of U.S. equity trading at Banc of America, says he hasn't heard any recent takeover rumors about Sun. "The way I look at it, the stock rallied simply because it's a big portion of tech, and tech has had an unbelievable move," he says.

Back to Top